About Brief Encounters with a Divine(?)
and
(Very)
Female Entity
named?[1]
«ieve»[2]?
of bright white light,
but rather small,
full of humor and not to be feared
(at all)?
who
did not claim to be god[3],
maybe to not insult
feelings
(especially those of
ordinary
oppressors tend to be very
fragile)
or
maybe because "it" was "just"
some angel,
an "ordinary" saint,
the virgin Maria or else,
maybe
She
is not allowed to talk
(corinthians
14:34)?
or has to be subject to
someone:
[,
berlin]
she showed me
ephesians 5:22,23
as part of a tv show i saw with one
eye,
while visiting an old
friend of mine,
where a dude was "playing" the
savior for his wife(?) in
"disciplining" her?
wtf?
but this isn't the word of God?
the man as Jesus Christ for his
wife?
every husband in the world?
but convinced me,
(to be exalted above
everything)
signifying that less then
three percent of the bible are
"Her word"
which imo
should apply to almost all of us
(to me e. g. it's exactly 0.0%),
and that with the
on the
25th(?) of the month of
Janus[5](?),
a. D.æ
1 or
a. D.i
2026,
the end might get neigh for an unjust
and cruel patriarchy?
[in the
in
tempelhof]
i've
been an
agnostic
my entire life,
devoting myself more to
technology and science than
thoughts about the
possibility of an
intelligent design of the world,
even though I always wondered why
anything exists at
all.[6]
so i thanked the universe for
a beautiful fate all my life and
admired the karmic principal
i recognized,
but the biblical creation story,
in any case,
always seemed
(unfortunately)
illogical
to me.
until
february 22nd,
a. D.
2025,
when hate and cruelty of
(a) longtime cowardly,
misogynistic and somewhat
occult/esotheric
group(s) of (ultra-)nazi terrorists
from the shadows
(or
an allegory for an unjust and
degenerated
patriarchy?)[7]let me
(in a sense of a compelling proof)
see god,
who appeared
(to me!)
as a woman however,
placing the creation story in a
somewhat different light from my
perspective.
and suddenly all the details of
this true story here
make everyting logical
(to me)
and therefore way more
acceptable in a sense that
i know,
She
is
(always was and will ever
be). ☀️
[personal note:
if this should be
(our)
god,
then everything is perfect and in
harmony,
from my perspective.]
of a beautiful universe
She lets us live in,
their interpretations as well
as an attempt to describe a
mediate
encounter with a
manifestation of an
exalted creatress of all being,
"sleeping" in a single neuron
of the brain of a newcomer
(since easter monday of
a. D.i 2025?)[8].
things i wasn't fond
(or not too interested)
of as well as own[9] thoughts
regarding faith
(as wip
and stc).
but 1st of
all:
everything here is just
my
two cents or a
description of very
fresh
experiences.
imho
and regardless if simon petrus,
1st bishop of the early
christians in rome,
basti bürgergeld of
reinickendorf in berlin or any
girl/woman in the world: no one ever shall tell thou what
to believe,
to think,
to know[10],
to do nor
to let
be[11].
She
gave you everything
you'll ever need.
should you wish for an advice
one day,
just ask your
mother(s)
in direct line
with
Eve,
created by
(and probably having
a lot of)
Her⚠️ct[12].
God
(or the «Holy
Ghost» or any other
derivation of
it/him/her)
appears
(to me) as a woman
(and "mother"?),
not only to pour the story of
creation with sense
(for me),
but to show me that
where there is
aesthetics[13],
"evil"
can hardly
be.
furthermore,
the determining and
causative
"gender" seems
to be female[14],
Eve
is not made from a rib of a
man,
imho
it's almost the other
way round,
the most "original bible"
writes עלצ
(zela)
in hebrew,
which can mean rib,
but also side.
the "first" human being is called adam,
"in the original hebrew of genesis,
אָדָם
(Āḏām).
it is believed that the word is
connected to
אדמה
(adamah, meaning "earth"),
soil from whence God
created adam as
described in
genesis II."[15]
i am d'accord with the idea,
that this first human being had
no gender at all.[16]
why should it?
on a metalevel,
it doesn't make sense
(on the very 1st
step).
only on a 2nd step,
there's one "side" taken from that
first human being,
to forge/shape the woman,
which is then defining the
other side(s) on a
3rd step:
«eve» in hebrew is
חווה
(Ḥawwāh)
and is most commonly
believed
to mean "living one" or
"source of life"[17]
from the root
חיה
(ḥāyâ),
eng. "to live",
from the semitic root ḥyw,
arabic حياة.[18]
biology also
reflects this idea:
the 24th chromosome of the
male human
(#TODO mammals at
all?)
is euphemistically
called the y
chromosome,
although there's more than
just missing one leg.
it's actually severely
degenerated
[note:
something i cleary recon in
my daily life
😏][19]
and will likely
morphe/seperated
out over the next few million
years.[20].
and here it gets
interesting:
why isn't there a matriarchy,
when ..
there is but one
God[dess][21],
creating you
in Her
own image[22]
(btw:
which you can be proud of and
show like a
portrayal,
when everything else
would insult Her
stunning
work,
imho)
and it almost seems as if
She's
asking,
how it could happen,
that there is one sex,
which is
dominating the
others.
physical
dominance?
cruelty?
maybe.
but what else?
there isn't much more,
imho.
sure:
«it takes two to
tango»,
a phrase coined by ronald reagan
during the end of the
cold war,
but i think,
it is possible,
that She
is drawing an
allegory:
for years,
a persistent crew of
misogynistic
(nazi)
terrorists stalks me,
whose trick is
essentially
simple:
they commit the most
serious crimes against
their victims,
who
(as far as I can tell)
are exclusively
young women and girls.
whenever they get "caught",
they mutate into whiny
clowns to trigger
maternal
instincts.
and here's the thing:
it seems to be working
(with women not employed in
law enforcement and
even with nine years olds)
if one uses really
dirty tricks,
no matter how pathetic
i think it is.
imho:
whenever you hear the phrase
"but i love you",
run for your life or die
(slowly).
[note:
idea from ]
or ..
is the bible made for us dudes?
where are the female sinners?
ten righteous ones? (and the mothers?)
nowadays bible
(derivatives)
is (are) for sure exciting,
but bizarre too. She gave me the
idea that less then three
percent are
Her
"word".
the bible might be the best
contempoary
collection of early notes
regarding everything
divine,
but when Moses
(very well?)
might not even got
Her name,
i wouldn't call it
"the word of god". Her
"word"
for sure is in it,
but finding it might be the
hardest
(and most exciting?)
thing.
anyway:
wouldn't it be fair to see
"God"
(at least)
as partly female
to compensate for a very male
approach to reach for
Her/Him/It?[3]
even trinity does makes
sense from my
perspective and ..
can be completed by a
mother and a
daughter? and maybe even a
(holy)
corpus in order to
represent the
material world
we live in?
"Her"
biblical[1]name is
«הוהי»[23]She said
it a lot of times,
exodus
20:2 and the famous 1st
commandment from
exodus
20:3:
meaning:
"And God said to Moses,
«Ehyeh-Asher-Ehyeh, ..»
[note:
"modern" bibles translate this
as
«i am
that i
am»]
continuing,
«Thus shall you say
to the Israelites,
Ehyeh
sent me to
you.»”
meaning "i
am",
which doesn't make any
sense,
but could have very
well been a term,
Moses
pretty sure would have
expected,
when asking God for its
name:
«EHYeH»
⇨
«IEVE»
or
«YaHWeH».
maybe he just
misunderstood,
under stress,
hunger,
fatigue,
when
finding
its/Her
"word" is
difficult
enough,
to say the
least?
[note:
but i have to admit,
i kinda love
Moses for such a
slapstick
moment
😂]
and i am pretty sure now,
"Her" name means
«the
passionate»
or «zealous
one»
(dt.: „die
passionierte”,
„die eifrige”),
gets translated by modern
english bibles with
«for you shall not
worship any other god,
for the LORD
[note:
it is written
«YHWH»],
whose name is jealous,
is a jealous
god.»
or:
whose name means
«zeal»,
a zealous
god.
arabic h.w.y
(هوى)
roots here?
where the word hawaya
(هوايا)
derives from.
meaning
"love",
"affection",
"passion",
"desire".[25]or in short:
«love»?
Her color
(or that of other divine
entities?)
seems to be white
(to golden?)
light?
indicating
Her presence
of that
singularity
of a local
spatio-temporal
accumulation of
(a vanishingly small?)
part of Her
ego/entity(?)[26]
is Her decision and
the
(my)
mindset,
attention and
patience seemed to be
prepared by Her.
"own" thought:
so-called monogamy can evolve
adversely
(especially for the
female),
because it can interfere
with
(natural/evolutionary)
selection[30]
there seems to be no
prescriptive
prudishness
at all.
on the contrary:
whatever pleases everyone
involved
(even indirectly &
regardless
sex/gender?)
seems to be welcome
(with exceptions)[31],
as long as it is aesthetic[13] and
contributes to joy.
the halo/gloriola
of the so-called saints seems to be a
"natural"
phenomenon across all
cultures.[32]
i think,
a soul begins to shine,
when it is beautiful enough
(and that it is benevolence to
let the others work in
calmity).
[,
rome,
italy]
lots of the "normal" angels seem
to be female
(at least the heads).
e. g. at the «pons
aelius»
(or
ponte sant'angelo)
in rome,
towards the
castle
of the
(holy)
angels.
#TODO marian devotions as some kind
of a substitute religion in the south..
#TODO just kidding:
what does it mean when the soul weighs 21
grams and the answer to everything is
42? 😃
#TODO
you please consider
donating to
cover "working" time,
hosting expenses,
running "ads" and enabling
accommodation/supply,
since "we" are running around a lot,
trying to hide,
while getting heavily
sabotaged and offended all day,
not just by humans
(grüße an jodgod17[33]!). 😎
on the
25th(?) of the month of
Janus[5](?),
a. D.æ
1 or
a. D.i
2026,
the end might get neigh for an unjust
and cruel patriarchy?
can be completed by a
mother and a
daughter?
e. g. at the «pons
aelius»
(or
